There should be an option in the SystemPack to switch between 60 FPS (limited) and 144 FPS, but keep in mind that you'll experience strange issues with more than 60 FPS. Every TV and standard monitor is only limited to 60 Hz under Windows as far as I know. I'm using a TV for gaming because I need 55" and greater. And I don't think these 144 Hz G-Sync/Free-Sync monitors will become standard. And I don't have no visible flickering.ĭemondays mentioned what I wanted to say. I have currently 75 and it's good enough, but definitely 85Hz is much better. Here You can read more about differences if You want:Īnd sorry for OT Thanks for the link and yes, I know about that, but I mean that I don't want to buy some standard one since I have enough money for a new monitor, but I don't have a lot for an eye surgery. Hey, but do You realize that lcd monitors doesnt need so high refresh rate as old CRTs due to completely different way of how they display pixels? LCDs basically doesnt refresh pixells all the time like CRT do, so even low refresh rate do not tire human eyes. Even with 60hz it will be much better and healthier for You. 60Hz was terrible for eyes, 75Hz was a little better but flickering was still visible so if You really care about Your eyes You should get rid of this CRT with 75hz an buy some lcd. I remember having CRT monitor and comfortable refresh rate was from 85Hz. Here You can read more about differences if You want: That would definitely would be the best since even that I'm still using CRT monitors (since I don't want to buy a 60 Hz one) I have 75 fps and It would be better to have 120 or 144 when I will buy a new monitor.Hey, but do You realize that lcd monitors doesnt need so high refresh rate as old CRTs due to completely different way of how they display pixels? LCDs basically doesnt refresh pixells all the time like CRT do, so even low refresh rate do not tire human eyes. More FPS is mostly better if you have a monitor for it and it's better to spend more money on a one monitor than a surgery if your eyes would be damaged from the 60 Hz monitor. Well, you are right, but I don't have a 60 Hz and I'm planning to buy 144Hz since its way better than the 60 Hz monitor. And of course that I knew that original Gothic 1 was limited to 25 FPS since when I first time completed it was with that framerate.Īnd that's why I don't use 60 Hz monitor. That would definitely would be the best since even that I'm still using CRT monitors (since I don't want to buy a 60 Hz one) I have 75 fps and It would be better to have 120 or 144 when I will buy a new monitor. I would fully support this if the user can choose the limit since if not, then I wouldn't much like it. And having more than 300 FPS is not needed since probably nobody can see the difference. Keep in mind that original Gothic was limited to 25/30 FPS.And that's why I don't use 60 Hz monitor. You could make an extra option for 120/144 Hz monitors in the SystemPack ini, but for everyone who don't have this, 60 FPS will be the best! Not 61, not 70, not 300 -> 60. Skyrim recently got an update to add 60 FPS limitation to avoid heavy in-game bugs. External tools are a solution, but it's better to have this fixed directly by the game. An other thing is that even old games would kill your GTX 1080 2000 FPS, so it should never be unlimited. FPS should always be synchron with your monitor's refresh rate set by Windows. You might also start to see tearing and micro stuttering, which happens when your videocard is rendering frames faster than your monitor can display them. 60 FPS are smoother than 100 FPS and looks better on every Windows computer that runs on 60 Hz. No, you are absolutely wrong! More than 60 FPS will always cause negative effects on 60 Hz monitors, apart of physic issues in many games.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |